(15)In the course of granting or renewing the authorisation of a biocidal product that contains an active substance that is a candidate for substitution, it should be possible to compare the biocidal product with other authorised biocidal products, non-chemical means of control and prevention methods with regard to risks they pose and benefits from their use. As a result of such a comparative assessment, a biocidal product containing active substances identified as candidates for substitution should be prohibited or restricted where it is demonstrated that other authorised biocidal products or non-chemical control or prevention methods that present a significantly lower overall risk for human health, animal health and the environment, are sufficiently effective and present no other significant economic or practical disadvantages. Appropriate phase-out periods should be provided for in such cases.
◷
New version applies from 23/09/2013.
165 provisions change.
Later versions: 25/04/2014, 20/11/2019, 29/03/2021, 10/06/2021, 15/04/2022, 26/05/2024, 11/06/2024, 15/06/2026, 19/08/2026.
Recital 15 changes in this version: compare with the current text.