(3)In relation to requirements concerning the benchmark or family of benchmarks, competent authorities should be able to require changes to the compliance statement of a non-significant benchmark where they consider that the compliance statement is not clear about why the administrator concerned should be allowed not to comply with the requirements laid down in Article 11 and Articles 13 to 16 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011. That should in particular be the case where there is a lack of clarity about the level of control over the provision of the input data, the transparency of the procedures for consulting on any material change to the non-significant benchmark’s methodology, the process of reporting instances of manipulation or attempted manipulation of the non-significant benchmark, the code of conduct where the non-significant benchmark is based on input data from contributors, the capacity of the administrator to review and report on its compliance with the non-significant benchmark’s methodology and with Regulation (EU) 2016/1011, and, where input data is contributed by a supervised contributor, whether that is done with appropriate controls to ensure the accuracy, integrity and reliability of the input data.