(3)Institutions or entities should not be required to include, in the contractual provisions governing a relevant liability, the contractual term, where such inclusion would be illegal in the relevant third country. This could be the case where, for example, the laws, or instructions from the authorities of the third country do not allow for such terms. It should also be considered as impracticable for an institution or entity to include the contractual term in an agreement or instrument where that institution or entity is unable to amend those contractual provisions. This is often the case where agreements or instruments are concluded in accordance with international standardised terms or protocols setting uniform terms and conditions for such kinds of agreements or instruments. Trade finance products, such as guarantees, counter-guarantees, letters of credit or other instruments used in the context of supporting or funding trade transactions are typically issued subject to internationally recognised standard terms or rules set by an internationally recognised industry organisation or developed based on standard bilateral customs. Impracticability might also arise where the institution or entity concludes financial services provision contracts with non-Union bodies, including financial service providers, trading venues, financial market infrastructures or custodians that use standard terms that cannot be negotiated by the institution or entity.