(13)There might be circumstances where a reasonable suspicion of market abuse is formed after the suspected activity occurred, due to subsequent events or available information. That should not be a reason for not reporting the suspected activity to the competent authority. To demonstrate compliance with the reporting requirements in those specific circumstances, the person submitting the STOR should be able to justify the time discrepancy between the occurrence of the suspected activity and the formation of the reasonable suspicion of market abuse having been committed, being committed or likely to be committed.