(6)The AMF and BaFin also assessed more recent trading activity of the requesting financial counterparties on trading venues in the United Kingdom and on US SEFs that are recognised as equivalent under Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014. First, the AMF and BaFin provided evidence showing that the requesting financial counterparties remained active on certain trading venues in the United Kingdom after 2021, given that they continued to receive RFQs and execute transactions on the basis of the RFQs received in derivatives not subject to the derivative trading obligation. Second, the AMF and BaFin provided evidence showing that, in the years 2021 to 2024, the requesting financial counterparties regularly received RFQs and executed transactions on the basis of RFQs received in derivatives subject to the derivative trading obligation on certain US SEFs recognised as equivalent under Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, including with respect to non-EEA counterparties with whom the requesting financial counterparties did not interact on EEA trading venues. Furthermore, the AMF and BaFin provided evidence showing that the requesting financial counterparties committed to implement measures, following the suspension of the derivative trading obligation, to ensure that, when concluding transactions under that suspension, they would only respond to RFQs from non-EEA counterparties that have no active membership on an EEA trading venue that offers trading in the OTC derivative subject to the derivative trading obligation.