Question
The segmentation criterion 'Facility Type' is used to define the benchmarking portfolios. In Annex I, Template C 102.00 (Definition of Low Default Portfolios), for some portfolios the facility type is 'other facilities'. The characteristic value 'other facilities' is not defined in Annex II. However, in Annex II, Template 102, 'full risk' is a characteristic value for the segmentation criterion 'Facility Type'. 'Full risk' is not used in Annex I. Is it correct to assign 'full risk' to 'other facilities' and if yes, is it correct to only assign 'full risk' to 'other facilities'?
Background on the question
Inconsistency between Annex I and Annex II concerning segmentation criterion 'Facility Type'.
Answer
The facility type value 'Other facilities' used to define some portfolios in template C 102.00 (Definition of Low Default Portfolios) of Annex I to the Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on Supervisory Benchmarking) for the 2017-benchmarking exercise shall be interpreted as the option 'a) Full risk (100%)' described in the instructions on column 100 of template C 102.00 of Annex II to the ITS on Supervisory Benchmarking. Disclaimer The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal. The text of the Implementing Regulation may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A refers.