Taxonmy 3.5 - Inconsistant Validation rules

EBA Q&A 2025_7467 · Rejected question

Question

Relating to daisy chain deduction on M 03.00 report, 3 validations rules are inconsistent together (v10839_s, v22357_s and v22545_m)

Background on the question

v10839_s – warning : M 03.00 (r0620 ; c0010) >=0 v22357_s – warning : M 03.00 (r0293 ; c0010/0020) <=0 v22545_m – error : if {r0630} > 0.07 then {r0620 ; c0010} = {r0293 ; c0010} Only true if r0620 = r0293 = 0, which is not the case in case relating to daisy chain deduction and liquidation entities. In order to avoid an “error” with v22545, we chose to implement r0620 as a negative amount and have a warning for v10839_s for several subsidiaries within the Group.

Answer

This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has already been identified and will be considered for a forthcoming version of the Reporting framework / release of the respective validation rules.For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.

2 queries · page built in 45 msInventory f82bbfa3